Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This pull request introduces comprehensive support for Facebook Messenger as a new messaging connector in the Deveel Messaging Framework. The integration includes full Facebook Graph API v21.0 compliance with RestSharp HTTP client, bidirectional messaging capabilities, and extensive test coverage.
- Full Facebook Messenger Platform integration with Graph API v21.0 support
- Complete connector implementation with send/receive messaging, media attachments, and health monitoring
- Comprehensive test suite with unit, integration, and edge case coverage
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 26 out of 26 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| Solution and project files | Added Facebook connector projects to solution with proper build configurations |
| Core connector implementation | FacebookMessengerConnector with full messaging capabilities and error handling |
| Facebook service layer | RestSharp-based FacebookService for Graph API operations |
| Model classes | Facebook-specific message models (requests, responses, attachments, quick replies) |
| Schema definitions | Channel schemas for different Facebook Messenger use cases |
| Test projects | Comprehensive test coverage including unit, integration, and edge case tests |
| Documentation | Complete connector documentation with usage examples and API reference |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review for a chance to win a $100 gift card. Take the survey.
| Assert.False((bool)method!.Invoke(null, new object[] { "" })!); | ||
| Assert.False((bool)method.Invoke(null, new object[] { "short" })!); | ||
| Assert.False((bool)method.Invoke(null, new object[] { "token with spaces" })!); | ||
| Assert.False((bool)method.Invoke(null, new object[] { " " })!); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using reflection to test private methods makes tests brittle and tightly coupled to implementation details. Consider making the validation method internal and using InternalsVisibleTo attribute, or testing the validation indirectly through public methods.
| Assert.False((bool)method.Invoke(null, new object[] { " " })!); | |
| // Test valid token formats directly | |
| Assert.True(FacebookService.IsValidPageAccessToken("EAATest123456789|ValidPageAccessToken")); | |
| Assert.True(FacebookService.IsValidPageAccessToken("EAAGTest123456789abcdef")); | |
| Assert.True(FacebookService.IsValidPageAccessToken("someLongTokenWithPipe|123456")); | |
| } | |
| [Fact] | |
| public void ValidatePageAccessToken_InvalidTokens_ReturnsFalse() | |
| { | |
| // Test invalid token formats directly | |
| Assert.False(FacebookService.IsValidPageAccessToken("")); | |
| Assert.False(FacebookService.IsValidPageAccessToken("short")); | |
| Assert.False(FacebookService.IsValidPageAccessToken("token with spaces")); | |
| Assert.False(FacebookService.IsValidPageAccessToken(" ")); |
| // Use reflection to test the private method | ||
| var method = typeof(FacebookService).GetMethod("BuildFacebookMessagePayload", | ||
| System.Reflection.BindingFlags.NonPublic | System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Static); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Multiple test methods use reflection to access private methods. This pattern is repeated throughout the test file, making tests fragile to refactoring. Consider exposing these methods as internal or testing through public API behavior.
|
|
||
| // Assert | ||
| Assert.False(result.Successful); | ||
| Assert.Equal(ConnectorErrorCodes.GetStatusError, result.Error?.ErrorCode); // Fixed: Base class catches exceptions and converts to standard error code |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The comment suggests this test assertion was 'fixed' but the comment indicates uncertainty about the expected behavior. The test should verify the actual expected error code based on the implementation, not guess based on comments.
| Assert.Equal(ConnectorErrorCodes.GetStatusError, result.Error?.ErrorCode); // Fixed: Base class catches exceptions and converts to standard error code | |
| // The base class catches exceptions from GetConnectorStatusAsync and returns ConnectorErrorCodes.GetStatusError (see FacebookMessengerConnector.GetStatusAsync implementation). | |
| Assert.Equal(ConnectorErrorCodes.GetStatusError, result.Error?.ErrorCode); |
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | |||
| namespace Deveel.Messaging | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The FacebookMessengerSchemaFactory class is missing copyright header and XML documentation comments that are present in other files in the project.
| e.CanSend = true; // Allow EmailAddress so it passes schema validation | ||
| e.CanReceive = false; | ||
| e.IsRequired = false; | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The EmailAddress endpoint type is allowed for sending with a comment indicating it's just to pass validation, but this could be confusing for API consumers. Consider either properly supporting email addresses or removing this endpoint type from the schema.
| }) |
This pull request introduces support for Facebook Messenger as a new messaging connector in the Deveel Messaging Framework. The changes include updates to the solution and documentation, as well as the addition of new project files and code for Facebook Messenger integration. The most important changes are grouped below:
Solution and Project Structure
Deveel.Messaging.Connector.Facebookand its associated test projectDeveel.Messaging.Connector.Facebook.XUnitto the solution fileDeveel.Messaging.Model.sln, including build configurations and project nesting. [1] [2] [3]Deveel.Messaging.Connector.Facebook.csprojwith dependencies onRestSharpandMicrosoft.Extensions.Http.Documentation Updates
docs/README.mdanddocs/connectors/README.md) to include Facebook Messenger in connector lists, feature matrices, installation instructions, and use case recommendations. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]NotificationService. [1] [2] [3]Connector Features and Capabilities
Code Additions
FacebookAttachmentandFacebookPayload).StatusInfoconstructor to properly assign the description field.These changes collectively enable Facebook Messenger integration in the framework, update documentation for discoverability, and lay the foundation for development and testing of Facebook messaging features.